A higher score with the Time On Site metric shows that a vendor is able to resolve issues quickly, and are not spending more time onsite than the average work order.
A low score shows that a vendor spends more time making repairs onsite compared to other work orders with similar trades and priority.
Purpose / Metric Definition:
Measures how much time a vendor spends on-site compared to the expected average duration. The score reflects efficiency by comparing actual time against the standard time for similar Purchase Orders, using standard deviation as a benchmark.
Category:
Performance
Logic / Formula:
CASE
WHEN POHoursOnSite IS NULL THEN NULL
WHEN (POHoursOnSite - StandardHoursOnSite) >= 2 * STDEVHoursOnSite THEN 0
WHEN (POHoursOnSite - StandardHoursOnSite) >= 1 * STDEVHoursOnSite THEN 0.2
WHEN (POHoursOnSite - StandardHoursOnSite) >= 0.5 * STDEVHoursOnSite THEN 0.4
WHEN (POHoursOnSite - StandardHoursOnSite) >= 0.25 * STDEVHoursOnSite THEN 0.6
WHEN (POHoursOnSite - StandardHoursOnSite) >= 0 THEN 0.8
WHEN (POHoursOnSite - StandardHoursOnSite) >= -0.075 * STDEVHoursOnSite THEN 0.8
ELSE 1.0 END AS Performance_HoursOnSite
Scoring Rules:
100% → Vendor time is well below expected duration (more efficient than -0.075 STDEV)
80% → Vendor time is near expected duration (between -0.075 and 0 STDEV)
60% → Minor overage (between 0.25 and 0.5 STDEV)
40% → Noticeably over expected time (between 0.5 and 1 STDEV)
20% → Substantially over expected time (between 1 and 2 STDEV)
0% → Far past expected duration (≥ 2 STDEV)
Not Scored (NULL) → PO never entered 'On-Site' status
Notes / Exceptions (optional):
Uses Umbrava averages for Trade and Priority Category to determine expected time.
Links to Dashboards/Reports that use this metric:
Was this article helpful?
That’s Great!
Thank you for your feedback
Sorry! We couldn't be helpful
Thank you for your feedback
Feedback sent
We appreciate your effort and will try to fix the article